Discussions

Embroidered items are here and the store is LIVE!

September 08, 2010, 06:35:24 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Gallery Links INVITE YOUR FRIENDS! Login Register  

Share

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Electric trolling motor for Puget Sound bottomfishing?  (Read 353 times)
CanAm
BullHead
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7



« on: January 23, 2010, 11:25:04 AM »

Hi. I'll be putting a bowmounted electric trolling motor on a 20' Duckworth I'm setting up for local lake fishing in North Idaho. I plan to do some trips to the coast, starting with bottomfishing in the sound and wonder if the electric troller would get any use there. If so I would go with the more spendy salt water version (Minn Kota Riptide). They make a system that uses GPS to hold a position etc. I know the electric trollers are used a lot on the flats over east, just not sure if conditions in the sound, bays (more wave action I presume) would make it feasable.

Anyone using them or see them in use?
Logged

Arlie
fishseeker
Honored 08 Contributor
Global Moderator
Summer Steel
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2147


Murp!


« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2010, 11:45:51 AM »

Have seen them used, but you would be a lot better off with a reg. kicker motor on the back. With a kicker if something happens to your main you can still get in! Sucks to be floating in the shipping lanes in the sound trying to fight the tides with the Electric!!
Logged
billfishn
Honored Contributor
Honored PSA
Brookie
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 136



« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2010, 02:50:36 PM »

I would recommend a 6 to 9 hp 2 stroke or 4 stroke for your boat on the sound.  You should be able to get a good used one for a reasonable price.
Logged

South King County Puget Sound Anglers
Mid Puget Sound fisheries Enhancement Group
CanAm
BullHead
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7



« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2010, 11:35:26 AM »

Sorry guys I should have let you know I have a 9.9 kicker with navimatic already. I want the electric for bass fishing and just wondered if it could be put to use on the ocean. I'll have to spend a fair bit more (around $1300) for a saltwater version which only comes with a 60" shaft in the top end model and they don't come with a built in transducer, something that would be kinda nice for a second bow mount finder.

I think I'll go with it. The boat control is just so much better and surely there will be calm enough conditions at least some of the time. If nothing else, the electronics may last longer even on freshwater as they are better protected to resist corrosion. It will look a little weird as they are white and you don't see that around here but that's OK.
Logged

Arlie
The Peddler
Puke Master
Honored 08 Contributor!
Cabezon
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 457



« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2010, 09:51:50 AM »

I think it's worth it to have the salt version, even if you just use it in Fresh water.  I used to work for MotorGuide, and know that the salt water versions from both manufacturers are better sealed, and typically last longer.  FWIW.
Logged

Get Involved, or don't Whine! www.nsia.org - join/support CCA.

Support your local "Peddler," Fish with Quantum rods and reels! - Visit www.quantumfishing.com

"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so-much worth doing as simply messing-about in boats."
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  

 
Jump to:  

* Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)

2008 WDFW ENFORCEMENT NEWSLETTER
Fishing Regs
2010 Hunting Regulations
King 5 Doppler
Lake Trout Plants
WDFW
River Levels
Boating Facilities

Wa, Topo Maps
Tide Chart

To support the website or buy shirts & decals click one of the photo links below.

 support the site!

web stats

Locations of visitors to this page

email suport: admin@washingtonfishingfools.com for log in issues

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.099 seconds with 21 queries.